10 things we learnt/were reminded about pitching to angels this week
- there is no 'right' pitch style: some may be rammed with content but the founder talks too much and gives long answers to every question, while another leaves a lot out but keeps the proposition simple and leaves masses of time for Q&A AND gives quick answers, so lots of angels get to talk - which would get you best connected to the business, would you prefer, on which side?
- sometimes a widget is the main story; what's the IP story, can it be hacked, how long before the large customer/competitor copies what looks like a simple model, or will they just acquire rather than build (most do!)?
- why is the firm paying its founders so much this early and need so many full time employees?
- is it too early for this firm to be looking at a Series A next time, or why are they back for a relatively small top-up at this point?
- the apparently weakest proposition (to this angel) may have the most stellar supporters and the highest valuation; do you go with your gut, or follow the money?
- how much time and value is that silicon valley trophy VC really bringing - are they cosmetic or materially adding value to the business?
- follow-ons sometimes seem to be losing momentum as they grow; how do you help them up to the next level?; is it just money, or is there something else missing; is that nagging doubt about the diversified focus or marketing to sales conversion rate going to trip them up ultimately?
- where are the marketer founders?
- dont sweat every question at the pitch session; get the main issues into the early stage due diligence instead, the story has a way to run before anyone sees even a first draft SHA..
- pitch sessions are fun, sociable and highly addictive!
Copyright ©Mike Davis/ AskAnAngel Ltd 2017
Join our exclusive FREE Subscriber List Top Right!
Join our exclusive FREE Subscriber List Top Right!
Follow me on Twitter at @ask1angel
Facebook Page: Ask An Angel (@ask1angel)